▲ | littlecranky67 4 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Article is outdated (2008) and makes a single argument: Desalination requires too much energy. Becaues it is outdated, it doesn't account for the excess energy a lot of places and countries have from wind and solar. Water desalination is a prime candidate (along with Bitcoin mining and AI model training, sigh) for using available excess energy from renewable that cannot be stored otherwise. Clean/drinking water can be stored easily - it is called a freshwater lake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | KaiserPro 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
The UK also doesn't have enough power, well not enough to do whats needed for desalination. It would be _vastly_ cheaper and easier to build reservoirs. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | derriz 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not really - renewable curtailment and negative wholesale electricity prices happen but not frequently enough that you can generally afford to leave a capital intensive investment like a bitcoin mining setup, a water desalination plant or a hydrogen electrolyser idle 90% of the time waiting for cheap electricity. And the market and technological developments (batteries) are actively working against this pricing anomaly - I can see the phenomena of negative pricing disappear completely in electricity markets in the next few years given the current explosion in grid battery deployment. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|