▲ | IneffablePigeon 5 days ago | |||||||
A camera is no substitute for actual visibility, at best it’s a mediocre workaround to the problem. There is no evidence at all that I’ve seen that there are fewer pedestrian collisions in modern large vehicles - I would be interested if you have any such data. Regardless, all of these “extreme measures” could be applied to a smaller car (or even just one with a smaller wall at the front) for the best of both worlds. And collisions will happen regardless, sensors and cameras are not a magic solution. | ||||||||
▲ | protocolture 4 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
I mean, the risk was already socially acceptable, and it has further been reduced as far as practicable. >A camera is no substitute for actual visibility I dont even know what point you are trying to make here. Seeing things a different way is not seeing things? Make it make sense. | ||||||||
|