▲ | ViewTrick1002 3 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> seasonal variations Or overbuild renewables reducing the seasonal variations. In cost terms when compared to nuclear power those would be insignificant. With fossil based energy systems we didn’t match production capacity to consumption 100% with peakers having low capacity factors. But somehow we can’t overbuild a kWh and need massive seasonal storage when it comes to renewables. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | idiotsecant 3 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Yes, if you have a magic planet spanning transmission system capable of handling the power flows over building solves the problem. Unfortunately that's orders of magnitude more expensive than storage, which we already can't afford. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|