▲ | nurettin 2 days ago | |||||||
Frankly, this all sounds like hero worship and the language is very cringe. I know the backprop paper. I've read it in the early 2000s. And I remember Hinton as a co-author. Same with Boltzmann machines. Co-author. "Advisor to that great guy", "Teacher of this great guy", "Nobel price together with that guy" <- all of this leads me to the above conclusion. YMMV | ||||||||
▲ | polotics 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
just one example of the halo effect: having been instrumental in the development of an important technology doesn't magically make one an expert in the economic impact of that technology, as economy is a completely different field of study | ||||||||
▲ | glitchc 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I'm not a fanboy, far from it. I'm not affiliated with the lab or his work. I'm not even a big fan of machine learning. But Hinton's contributions to the field cannot be understated. He single-handedly kept it alive for two decades amid a massive lack of funding. Anyone who has worked in research will attest that this is an incredible feat. People on Hacker News seems to idolize the lone genius who somehow pulled himself up from his bootstraps. That person does not exist. The truth is that great minds are made, moulded into shape. That the best people behind our AI technology emerged from his lab is no coincidence. Those trash-talking Hinton on this forum are unlikely to achieve 1/100th of what he has accomplished. “The housecat may mock the tiger,” said the master, “but doing so will not make his purr into a roar.” [1] [1] http://www.catb.org/esr/writings/unix-koans/end-user.html | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | sriram_malhar 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
"Frankly, I just want to be a contrarian" | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | qwertytyyuu 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Come on there is space for theatrics on hacker news |