Isn't the difference between "capital -> labor -> capital" and "capital -> AI -> capital" (which is basically just "capital -> capital -> capital") that it's about the elimination of labor through its financialization? Not just that the poor get poorer, but from the POV of the rich that they don't even exist. (Conditional of course upon AI actually really being that much more productive than people and not dependent on them.)

▲

bitmasher9 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

AI is just capital, you said it yourself. AI just adds more capital to the capital + labor = more capital equation. The more value capital brings in comparison to labor, the more value capital takes from the result compared to labor.

The issue is the increasing imbalance of capital being overvalued compared to labor, and how that has a negative impact on most individuals.

▲

DalasNoin 2 days ago | parent [-]

I guess pizza is saying that labor (in the sense of human labor/employment) is coming to an end. If AI + robotics just drives the economy capital self multiplies with out labor.

	▲	bitmasher9 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Is labor actually going to zero?

▲

visarga 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

You should also consider that people have AI too, everyone has AI, AI makes no difference in competition. Like having Linux, or Google Search - immensely useful but not a differential. So "capital -> AI -> capital" would just be the inferior option. Like building a product with minimal coding and just putting together open source packages, that anyone could replicate in a few hours.

	▲	dns_snek 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		People don't "have" AI. People are being provided AI as a service by the corporations who invested billions into training it. If they ever make a leap where it can actually replace the workforce, it won't be provided for cheap like it is right now, and all the current open models will be obsolete.

▲

SubiculumCode 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Well, when AI replaces us as consumers, the economy will truly leave us behind

	▲	js8 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Capitalism already replaces many citizens with consumers, leaving some behind. Citizens have a say in how money are spent, not just how much money they get. Consumers might get nominal choice in how much money they get, but the choice of how to spend is either forced (e.g. rent or healthcare) or is meaningless (e.g. which brand of car to drive instead of having public transport).
	▲	eloisant 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Don't worry, capitalism knows how to make a business out of poor people. Just look at Walmart, and credit cards.

▲

jimbohn 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I think that this kind of automation will lead to assets outweighting "real" work way more than they already do now, and I hope I am wrong.

▲

some_guy_nobel 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Really makes you take a step back and wonder why Luigi was so celebrated. /s