"He also claimed the company failed to remedy the hacking and takeover of more than 100,000 accounts each day, ignoring his pleas and proposed fixes and choosing instead to prioritize user growth."

There is no oversight of these monstrosities of any sort. I doubt anyone would have issues with the thesis that Meta would implement anything that might curb their user numbers unless it was mandated.

Why would they? They are beholden to their shareholders first. If it isn't illegal then it isn't illegal, immoral perhaps but that is not illegal, unless it is illegal.

My learned friends are going to have to really get their bowling arms warmed up for this sort of skit. For starters, you need a victim ... err complainant.

Zuckerberg has a different class of shares

And not every CEO begins life in their company with "if you need any info just ask, they trust me, dumb fucks"