▲ | bigstrat2003 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The very sparse std is one of the few genuine mistakes I think Rust has made. I know the arguments for it, but I don't find them persuasive. A batteries included standard library, in my view, is just plain better and every modern language should have one. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | forrestthewoods 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oh man I feel the opposite. Rust is an example where a sparse stdlib is clearly superior and better and more successful. I mostly write C++ whose committee is incompetent and sniffs glue. And I deal a lot with Khronos committed who design pure garbage. “Design by Committee” is a pejorative for a reason. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | ModernMech 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
But what batteries to include? I'm sure your list of batteries is probably very different from mine, reflecting the difference in the work we both do. A lot of times when I hear a language has "batteries included", it's a bunch of features for web devs and nothing I would consider a "battery" for my projects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|