▲ | zokier 3 days ago | |
Sure, openwrt works. I too have run it on x86 vm at a time. That being said, there is lot that could be improved. My biggest gripe is the weird filesystem layout with overlays and stuff in /tmp and whatnot. I can see it being needed on tiny devices, but on bigger ones can I just have regular ext4/xfs gpt partitions please? Another thing is just replacing the tiny versions of software with regular ones, like busybox->gnu or dropbear->openssh etc. Systemd could be at least considered as init. All of this kind of things make sense when you consider openwrts origins. But on "big" system I'd just much rather have it be closer to "normal" Linux. | ||
▲ | hagbard_c 9 hours ago | parent [-] | |
OpenWRT on x86_64 does not use overlay mounts, here's an overview of a current instance running in a Proxmox-managed container:
No overlays, just a normal ext4 filesystem. Data in /etc is stored in /etc, data in /var is stored in /var, etc. OpenWRT running from a filesystem image is 'just another Linux distribution which happens to run the same software as that re-flashed router'. |