▲ | m_fayer 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
I’m pretty sure the “what if” in that article was meant in earnest. That article was playing out a scenario, in a nod to the ai maximalists. I don’t think it was making any sort of prediction or actually agreeing with those maximalists. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | jcranmer 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
It was the central article of the issue, the one that dictated the headline and image on the cover for the week, and came with a small coterie of other articles discussing the repercussions of such an AI. If it was disagreeing with AI maximalists, it was primarily in terms of the timeline, not in terms of the outcomes or inevitability of the scenario. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | tootie 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
And a tacit admission that absolutely nobody knows for sure what will happen so maybe let's just game out a few scenarios and be prepared. |