Personal anecdote: I do find typing to be a bottleneck in situations where typing speed is valuable (so notes in meetings, not when coding).

I can break 100wpm, especially if I accept typos. It's still much, much slower to type than I can think.

▲

stevage 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

My experience with taking notes in meetings is definitely that the brain is the bottleneck, not the fingers. There are times where I literally just type what the person is saying, dictation style (ie, recording a client's exact words, often helpful for reference, even later in the meeting). I can usually keep up. But if I'm trying to formulate original thoughts, or synthesise what I've heard, or find a way to summarise what they have been saying - that's where I fall behind, even though the total number of words I need to write is actually much smaller.

So this definitely wouldn't help me here. Realistically though, there ought to be better solutions like something that just listens to the meeting and automatically takes notes.

▲

nxobject 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If you want something free, available right now, and dependent on only an IME, have you considered learning a stenotyping/chording keyboard layout?

https://www.openstenoproject.org/plover/

	▲	Bjartr 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Yes, but having the discipline to practice enough to get faster than my normal typing speed has been an obstacle.

▲

robofanatic 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> notes in meetings

That’s already solved by AI, if you let AI listen to your meetings.

▲

Bjartr 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Not when I want my notes to contain my own thoughts or reminders to myself. That's only in my head and today I either have to miss out on what is being said next to type it out, speak up in that moment (even if not really on topic), or lose the thought entirely.

▲

Feathercrown 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I haven't found that to be very accurate. I suspect the internal idiosyncrasies of a company are an issue, as the AI doesn't have the necessary context.

▲

aeroaero 3 days ago | parent [-]

Seems like it would be much easier to solve that problem than it would be to cross the brain barrier and start interfacing with our thoughts, no? Just provide some context on the company etc

▲

littlestymaar 3 days ago | parent [-]

“Sounds like it would” yes, but on practice no off the self solution works remotely well enough.

> Just provide some context on the company etc

The necessary “context” includes at least the name and pronunciation of the names of all workers of a company with a non English first name, so it's far from trivial.

▲

comedowntous 3 days ago | parent [-]

> off the self

Was that deliberate, or a typo? I am genuinely wondering!

	▲	littlestymaar 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		It's a typo.

▲

j45 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Speech to text can be 130-200 wpm.

Also, keybr.com helps speed up typing if you were thinking about it.