[flagged]

Gang, who should we believe: a rando with 10 karma points who acts like he knows it all without any evidence or one of the last remaining journalistic institutions?

My man, Meta were caught torrenting/pirate books to train the garbage that is llama. Meta enabled a couple of genocides including the one in Myanmar. Meta suppressed reports on children safety (Washington Post probably is also activist journalism, right? https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/2025/09/08/met...).

We are not surprised at all that s company that has been consistently evil, is evil again.

▲

wizzwizz4 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Facebook doesn't give me a straight answer, when I ask them questions about their policies, even when my questions aren't answered by their policies. The job of the privacy team within Facebook is not privacy: it's reducing liability.

▲

farceSpherule 3 days ago | parent [-]

You obviously do not or have never worked there.

	▲	wizzwizz4 3 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Obviously not: if I had, I'd have inside contacts I could ask, instead of having to bother their public relations people to beg for scraps of intel about what they're doing with my information, while they act I don't believe they've lied to me – I'm not so uncharitable as to assume their incorrect "it's written in the policy!" claims were deliberate lies –, but they're certainly not forthcoming.
	▲	inetknght 3 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		You obviously do not or have never paid attention to news about Meta's many and repeated moral, ethical, and legal violations. That, or you have a vested interested in making sure that your stake in Meta does not depreciate in value.