▲ | giraffe_lady 3 days ago | |||||||
I don't think it fits in the genre particularly? Been a while since I read it though. The bigger omission is Byatt's Possession, predating The Secret History by a couple years and I think possibly being the type specimen of what is now called dark academia. | ||||||||
▲ | AlotOfReading 3 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The list doesn't have to be exhaustive. It also misses the vita nostra series, which is interesting as an example of the same subgenre occurring outside the anglosphere. The Secret History is generally regarded as the prototype for the modern subgenre though. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | defrost 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
Tangentially - it's an absurdist character rich fantasy bound by a 70 generations old castle (or university? Well, no, but shade is thrown). Not a clean fit to Dark Academia, but a lesser known and worthy forerunner. Also, Jonathan Rhys Meyers, Stephen Fry, and many others in the 2000 TV adaption is good entertainment for anyone with a DA bent. - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsPC8m4zo9g | ||||||||
▲ | libraryofbabel 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
Oh that’s interesting - I’d never thought of Possession as being dark academia. But you’re right, it is. It’s certainly one of my favorite novels, on another level than The Secret History which I also enjoyed. Every time I re-read it I am impressed all over again by how it’s woven together and, not least, how Byatt managed to write all the poems herself. |