| ▲ | jackphilson 4 days ago |
| Irrelevant but I like this pattern of using Gemini (or AI outputs in general) as sources. Please continue to do so and I encourage any readers to also adopt this pattern. I will also try to implement this pattern. |
|
| ▲ | measurablefunc 4 days ago | parent [-] |
| The sources are in the report. Gemini provides actual references for all the claims made. You'd know that if you actually looked but lack of intellectual rigor is expected when people are afraid of actually scrutinizing their beliefs of non-constructive inevitability. |
| |
| ▲ | jrave 4 days ago | parent [-] | | maybe you misread the post you‘re answering to here or are you suspecting sarcasm? the poster commended your usage of the footnote with the gemini convo as far as i can tell? | | |
| ▲ | measurablefunc 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Laid it on a little too thick to be sincere & more generally I don't comment on internet forums to be complimented on my response style. Address the substance of my arguments or just save yourself the keystrokes. | | |
| ▲ | jackphilson 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | It was a compliment and I was hoping to nudge the behavior of other HN comments. | |
| ▲ | andrepd 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | If you really can't see the irony of using AI to make up your thoughts on AI then perhaps there's keystrokes to be saved on your end as well. | | |
| ▲ | measurablefunc 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I recommend you address the content & substance of the argument in any further responses to my posts or if you can't do that then figure out a more productive way to spend your time. I'm sure there is lots of work to be done in automated theorem proving. |
|
|
|
|
