I mean the statement is pretty clear

>Any computer that has this package installed or running should be considered fully compromised. All secrets and keys stored on that computer should be rotated immediately from a different computer. The package should be removed, but as full control of the computer may have been given to an outside entity, there is no guarantee that removing the package will remove all malicious software resulting from installing it.

It sounds like the package then somehow executes and invites other software onto the machine. If something else has executed then anything the executing user has access to is now compromised.

Confusing as hell. From code analysis shared malicious code replaces ethereum and other crypto wallet addresses in browser context. You can install malicious package, run it, run it in browser context (ie. in your playwright tests), then update package to not compromised version and you're fine - your system is clean.

This incident would be much more severe if the code would actually steal envs etc. because a lot of packages have dependency on debug as wildcard.