> Signal's threat model has never included "you are directly messaging an adversarial party and expect to retain control over redistribution of those messages".

On the contrary.

https://signal.org/blog/signal-doesnt-recall/?pubDate=202508...

> On the contrary

Well, no, that doesn't contradict what I said at all. That link isn't about treating the recipient of your messages as an adversarial actor. The recipient can still choose to enable it, if they want to provide Microsoft access to the messages they receive.

Huh? That is very explicitly about preventing the migration of your signal messages into Windows Recall. Not the threat model you discuss.