▲ | close04 2 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
I thought it was “intellectual curiosity” but it turns out it was a segway into insisting with your own preferences and eventually when being contradicted by others with their own needs and preferences, becoming plain insulting. Will leave your words here for reference: > I think ignorance is bliss and you should avoid knowing about anything that could be better. Your mind might do this for you (rejection) but best not to tempt fate. There’s nothing intellectual about fake curiosity, passive aggressive remarks, or insistently pushing your opinion just for the sake of sounding smarter than the next guy. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | dijit 2 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
I was curious about why someone would have a preference, what does Teams serve that alternatives do not. But you blanket claimed its fine, its not fine. I won’t work in a company that forces me to use Teams- its a good proxy for how they think about internal communications and how they feel about staff. You can claim what you want, I was curious, but don’t come in here telling people its ok to use teams- we’ve established that his options were fucking WebEx- which is also not fine. | |||||||||||||||||
|