stale2002 2 days ago

> you're using trump coin as an exemplar?

Its an exemplar of "The government definitely isn't going to go after the crypto space, as even something as ridiculous as this is allowed". |

This is because you previously said "what you can't do is suggest throwing them out altogether".

But if freaking trump coin exists, then it looks like, yes, we actually can throw out all the rules.

> crypto won??

It won the regulation war, yes. Its not going away. If the president launched his own meme coin, then everyone else is safe.

▲

kiitos 2 days ago | parent [-]

when you said "crypto won" you weren't talking about a regulation war, you were talking about a war between crypto and banking in general, in that war crypto has obviously not won, or even really entered the fight

trump coin is obviously illegal, it has no bearing on any discussion of policy

but you're obviously fully bought-in to the hype, so, you do you my dude

▲

stale2002 a day ago | parent [-]

> when you said "crypto won" you weren't talking about a regulation war

Yes that is what I was talking about. Its why I said:

'Crypto won. Beyond everyone's most extreme expectations. The "regulators" lost. '

You see that 'The "regulators" lost' part? That is where I was referencing the regulation war. Its why I used the word regulators. Crypto won, extremely, in the regulation war.

It was in direct response to this statement: "but what you can't do is suggest throwing them out altogether"

> trump coin is obviously illegal

Ok. So then yes crypto was able to throw out the rules altogether. The rules are gone. They have been thrown out. Your original statement of "you can't do is suggest throwing them out altogether" isn't true.

	▲	kiitos 18 hours ago \| parent [-]
		ok well we are not talking about the same thing, keep on carrying that torch, i wish you the best