| ▲ | FergusArgyll 4 days ago | |||||||
0x66a9893cC07D91D95644AEDD05D03f95e1dBA8Af 0x10ed43c718714eb63d5aa57b78b54704e256024e 0x13f4ea83d0bd40e75c8222255bc855a974568dd4 0x1111111254eeb25477b68fb85ed929f73a960582 0xd9e1ce17f2641f24ae83637ab66a2cca9c378b9f Source: https://github.com/chalk/chalk/issues/656#issuecomment-32670... | ||||||||
| ▲ | dbdr 4 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
Next comment: > Those are swap contract addresses, not attacker addresses. E.g. 0x66a9893cC07D91D95644AEDD05D03f95e1dBA8Af the Uniswap v4 universal router addr. > Every indication so far is that the attacker stole $0 from all of this. Which is a best-case outcome. | ||||||||
| ||||||||