▲ | bluGill 3 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The fallen civilization was the Roman empire, so closer to 1500 years if you only count the western Roman Empire (which most do), or 600 years if you count the East. while a lot was last most technology was not and even knowledge of government was not lost. You can get even m,roe interesting if you look too China, India, or the Americas for civilizations - but most of us don't really know much about them and don't think about them when we think of lost history. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | Nicook 3 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Even if you want to stick with a western history based narrative, you can go back to the bronze age collapse before that. See ancient greek writing about how each progressive age gets worse (golden -> silver -> bronze -> heroic -> iron) . Lost tech in China is pretty fascinating. There's archeological evidence of very advanced clocks that predate similar European ones, but they seem to have lost the knowledge on how to build it with the builder (City was conquered, clock was dismantled, his son was unable to reconstruct it). Meanwhile euros were able to push their knowledge forward more or less uninterrupted from the middle ages on. Seems pretty clear to me that we could easily lose a bunch of knowledge again. Could even argue we're very close. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|