> No tests whatsoever.

Test coverage between subsystems in the Linux kernel varies widely. I don't think a lack of tests would prevent inclusion.

> No thanks and no deal.

I mean, now we have a driver for this old hardware that runs on a modern kernel, which we didn't before. I imagine you don't even have that hardware, so why do you care if someone else gets some use out of it?

The negativity here in many of these comments is just staggering. I've only recently started adopting LLM coding tools, and I still remain a skeptic about the whole thing overall, but... damn. Seems like most people aren't thinking critically and are just regurgitating "durrrr LLMs bad" over and over.

Yes, the negativity is infuriating. This is the mindset that is going to get left behind. I'm no LLM maximalist but they clearly have their uses in the right context and the right hands.