| ▲ | KingMob 5 days ago | |
Setting aside the categories of art and literature, training LLMs on FOSS software seems aligned with the spirit, if not the letter, of the licenses. It does nothing to fix the issues of unpaid FOSS labor, though, but that was a problem well before the recent rise of LLMs. | ||
| ▲ | creesch 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
> FOSS software seems aligned with the spirit, if not the letter, of the licenses. Yeah, only if you look at permissive licenses like MIT and Apache, it most certainly doesn't follow the spirit of other licenses. | ||
| ▲ | lordhumphrey 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
The "spirit" of FOSS licences the various sorts of ideas that lead to the GNU project and the FSF in the 80s, and all that user-freedom-fighting heritage. I think even critics of the GNU project and the FSF would have to admit that as historically accurate. I can only presume, then, that your comment is based on a lack of awareness of the history of FOSS licencing. Perhaps a read of this would be a good start: | ||
| ▲ | vbarrielle 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
I'm not sure it's very well aligned with the spirit of copyleft licenses. | ||