Waiting for someone to explain that iPhone has replaced this too (via streaming), completely unaware that the origin of the stream is likely a 3.5mm jack on... an actual scanner.

▲

brewdad 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

While very true, so long as someone keeps that scanner online and the source remains unencrypted, only one person needs to own a scanner rather than hundreds.

Sadly, my city now encrypts all police channels. Fire and EMS can still be streamed though.

▲

BrandoElFollito 3 days ago | parent [-]

I am surprised they such sensitive channels are not encrypted. Both for confidentiality and integrity.

▲

eythian 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

It depends on the region and specific needs, but a common reason for not encrypting is that it adds complexity in an emergency (where, e.g., people might need to communicate from other regions nearby, or ambulance needs to talk to fire, maybe civil defence or AREC needs to be involved.) The simplicity of plain unencrypted radio can outweigh the benefits of secrecy.

This said, different places weigh factors differently, there's no one-size-fits-all answer.

▲

oniony 3 days ago | parent | prev [-]

But then you lose accountability.

	▲	BrandoElFollito 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		In what sense?

▲

bluGill 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Likely replaced by group text for most. my grandpa drove snowplow for the state and often had the scanner listening for when he might be called in. he couldn't respond directly but he did call dispatch to give his ability to come in. Pagers probably replaced that for many.