| ▲ | gruez 2 days ago | |
>When Facebook started, it was a different era. And since then, Facebook has clearly abused their position with anti-competitive behaviours. Insurgents like tiktok show that even today, people will happily give up their privacy for some dopamine. >If they can keep using Google Chrome for free, we already know the answer. Why would google continue maintaining chrome if they can no longer derive any benefit from it? >If the only way for them to have a reasonable browser would to pay... who knows? People pay more than that to access movies that they could download as torrents. No, the contention is that people will go for free browsers that violate their privacy or monetize them somehow, not some future where all browsers cost money. >Maybe it's enough to pay 1$/year for a company to maintain a reasonably secure browser with the features that people actually need. Do people actually need QUIC? Not sure. Remember when whatsapp was also $1/year, ostensibly for similar reasons? How did that go? | ||
| ▲ | palata 2 days ago | parent [-] | |
> Why would google continue maintaining chrome if they can no longer derive any benefit from it? That is unrelated to the sentence you quote: if people can use Google Chrome for free, they don't pay for a browser. But if Chrome disappeared, they would still need a browser. Maybe they would pay if they didn't have a free choice? > No, the contention is that people will go for free browsers that violate their privacy or monetize them somehow, not some future where all browsers cost money. If there are more browsers instead of a monopoly, then websites will work on the paid, secure browser that I will use, so I'm happy. I don't want to prevent people from using bad software: I want to make it possible for companies to build good software. By not using Chromium today, many times the websites don't work correctly because devs don't care, because Chromium is a monopoly. I say split it! Then websites will have to work on more than 1 browser. > Remember when whatsapp was also $1/year, ostensibly for similar reasons? How did that go? It was a huge success? WhatsApp is still a huge success. | ||