I also agree that this comment is likely AI generated (i.e., "why this matters" gave it away for me. I think I've seen this phrase a lot with ChatGPT). I think it is the last part of the last sentence and the toeing of the party line that bugs me, "likely aimed at improving security screening and preventing abuse of the system". It's "Manufacturing Consent"[0] à la 21st Century.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_Consent

▲

linotype 2 days ago | parent [-]

Again, please point out what’s wrong in the post and I will correct it.

	▲	julienchastang 2 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		"likely aimed at improving security screening and preventing abuse of the system" This is an opinion. Is it yours, or the AI's? Moreover, is the AI just trying to be agreeable or is this coming from a platform that has a political agenda, in this case supporting the political actors that are in charge of this visa change? These are the questions that we need to ask ourselves in these modern times.
	▲	CamperBob2 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		As jeffbee says, most HN users are perfectly capable of using ChatGPT as well.