▲ | bastawhiz 4 days ago | ||||||||||||||||
Perhaps I'm being overly cynical, but I have zero faith that any device whose primary distinguishing feature is a subscription connectivity service will be usable in more than five years. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | zymhan 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
What does Garmin gain by killing off an older device if the owner still pays for a subscription? Also, it's not like this is a hypothetical question, they've been around for decades. They do have a track record you can refer to, instead of just blind faith. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
▲ | Lio 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||
The oldest still supported Garmin inReach device is the original DeLorme inReach from 2011 (Garmin bought DeLorme). That at least bodes well for long term support. I suspect that subscription supported devices will actually get better support than standard Garmin products. | |||||||||||||||||
▲ | _xtrimsky 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||
i'm an owner of their Garmin 945 LTE released over 4 years ago. I have paid the subscription since. The device is still working very well, still got an update a couple of months ago. Battery still lasts about 5 days. | |||||||||||||||||
|