| ▲ | givemeethekeys 2 days ago |
| I find it amazing that theres so much sympathy towards giant Korean megacorp here. “Oh, maybe they got mixed up with the visa because language”. No they did not. “Oh, maybe it’s really difficult to find local talent”. No it isn’t. Not for them. There are many advantages for them to illegally fly in a whole
Workforce. That is why they did it. “ |
|
| ▲ | tripletao a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| What makes you confident they were acting illegally? Here's a US embassy: > A B-1 visa may be granted to specialized workers going to the United States to install, service, or repair commercial or industrial equipment or machinery purchased from a company outside of the United States, or to train U.S. workers to perform such services. https://es.usembassy.gov/visas/commercial-industrial-workers... Many of those detained have been reported to be employed by Hyundai's equipment vendors. That would be consistent with activities of this nature. It's probably a coin flip whether a different DHS staffer would agree, though. Interpretation of these rules has always been notoriously inconsistent, and probably explains the problem here. |
|
| ▲ | mattnewton 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| It’s more exasperation at how ridiculous this process is, treating foreign labor like dangerous criminals by default. |
| |
| ▲ | 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | [deleted] | |
| ▲ | dazilcher 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | How do you suggest we should treat foreign illegal labor? | | |
| ▲ | mattnewton 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | In this case, give them and the company responsible a court summons? Instead they detained all the Koreans in the building and appear to have used them as a negotiating chip in an upcoming “deal” with the government of South Korea. This is behavior we expect of a banana republic not an allied nation of laws. | | |
| ▲ | jacquesm 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | jleyank a day ago | parent | next [-] | | Don’t forget ruling by decree. | | |
| ▲ | jacquesm a day ago | parent [-] | | That was not meant as an exhaustive list, more like a sample, but yes, ruling by degree is a big one (as is ignoring parliament/congress). |
| |
| ▲ | senectus1 a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | while all these things are true, they're not great descriptions of a banana republic. | | |
| ▲ | jacquesm a day ago | parent [-] | | Feel free to add the ones that you think that are, as long as they apply. - Sham judicial processes used to strongarm officials? Check. | | |
| ▲ | jenadine a day ago | parent [-] | | From Wikipedia: > the term banana republic describes a politically and economically unstable country with an economy dependent upon the export of natural resource. The dependence upon natural resource may be hard to check. | | |
| ▲ | jacquesm a day ago | parent [-] | | Give it some time, they're emulating russia in just about every other respect as well. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | cmxch a day ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | amatecha a day ago | parent [-] | | To the people who already lived in NA before we settlers took over, we were the "illegals". The irony of xenophobic fear of immigrants will never cease to amuse me. (signed, a descendant of Zacharie Cloutier) | | |
| ▲ | s1artibartfast a day ago | parent [-] | | It's not really that ironic. The native Americans fought and lost. If they had their way there would be no USA or settlers. Where is the irony in this? It seems the lesson is that if foreign people want to come and live here, they better come with an army and be prepared to fight. Another lesson is that if you let them in they will displace you and diminish your autonomy. | | |
| ▲ | amatecha a day ago | parent [-] | | Immigrants, by and large, aren't waging war or invading. Of course the indigenous people fought - their home was being totally taken over, by force. That's not what's happening today. | | |
| ▲ | helqn a day ago | parent [-] | | What’s happening today is that megacorps are bringing in people illegally to dump the salaries of the locals and for some reason the left, which should fight for the working rights of the locals, is siding with the revenue of the billionaires. |
|
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | jayd16 a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Like people, maybe? What is the point of treating them like violent criminals other than to dehumanize them? Is it really any more effective than one guy reviewing the payroll and passing out fines until the issues are resolved? Besides, they haven't been charged with anything so in the US they are considered innocent. | | |
| ▲ | FridayoLeary a day ago | parent [-] | | Which is why they are being flown home. I see no dehumanizing going on. They were detained because they had no right to be in the country. You are putting a spin on
this that simply doesn't exist. I'm frankly baffled. You have a large capitalist corporation, flouting the laws of the country they're in and exploiting cheap labour. The US are simply enforcing the law like you would expect from any non banana republic. I can't think of in issue where the left should be so aligned with the government. It's a scandal and i hope the executives get held to account. | | |
| ▲ | port11 a day ago | parent [-] | | This is a malevolent interpretation. They were in the country to transfer knowledge and help build a factory to create jobs in the US. By mistake (maybe?), some visas expired, and then all workers are arrested. Doesn't that seem like an exaggerated response? It's not like they don't respect the US laws and regulations… | | |
| ▲ | helqn 21 hours ago | parent [-] | | Staying in the US when you don’t have a valid visa is disrespecting the US laws and regulations. | | |
| ▲ | jayd16 19 hours ago | parent [-] | | Inappropriate use of force, search and seizure and racial profiling is disrespecting the US laws and regulations. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | ivysly 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | how about like any other kind | | | |
| ▲ | eli_gottlieb a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Like the wage-slaves of dangerous criminals. | |
| ▲ | giraffe_lady a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This is easy lol you go after the people benefitting from their labor. | |
| ▲ | politelemon 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Not like dangerous criminals. Not with white gloves. It isn't binary. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | seanmcdirmid a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Around 90% of foreigner contractors that come to the USA to set up a factory or do maintenance on a factory are here under weird visa arrangements that the ICE would be able to poke holes in regardless. The right visa doesn’t exist, or impossible to obtain, so he Germans/swiss/japanese/koreans/taiwanese/and Chinese come here on visa waiver or simple B1 visas, or even tourist visas, to get the job the they need done out the way quickly (usually a few days or a week of work). The American visa system for short term work is simply messed up, and it’s much easier to get a visa to do the same thing in China than in the USA (surprise, guess where people decided to set up their factories?). America was really just wink/nudge before (we want you to setup a factory here! But no, we can’t really make the visa situation work out…you know what to do…), but now ICE needs to make their quotas and this is just an easy target for them. The USA is just a bad place for foreign companies to setup factories: you need an army of immigration lawyers to do it, and be willing spending a lot of time waiting to get the “proper visas” for key personnel. South Korea’s interest in getting those engineers back isn’t just purely empathy based, there are probably only a handful of engineers in Korea that can do what they do (good luck getting that factory going before your term is out, Mr. Trump). |
| |
| ▲ | jacquesm a day ago | parent [-] | | > good luck getting that factory going before your term is out, Mr. Trump That may well have been the goal in the first place. | | |
| ▲ | seanmcdirmid 19 hours ago | parent [-] | | Trump has always marketed these other countries investing in US manufacturing as a huge win, I doubt he is against this factory being built in a critical southern swing state. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| [deleted] |
|
| ▲ | joenot443 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I'm expecting this to be one of those American news stories where the public reaction is entirely dependent on the current party in power, right? It feels weird for HN to be going to bat for a company abusing labor laws, am I missing something here? |
| |
| ▲ | haswell 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | When the agency enforcing those labor laws is also blatantly violating the law while carrying out other highly publicized enforcement actions, they will be scrutinized for everything they do, including actions that were likely legal/necessary. That's part of the problem with the government breaking the law - legitimate actions are no longer seen as legitimate, because they have undermined themselves in the public eye. I also don't think people are "going to bat for a company abusing labor laws" so much as they are highly suspicious of these enforcement actions given the complete lawlessness displayed elsewhere and imagine the possibility that there were more diplomatic solutions that still address the problem appropriately. | |
| ▲ | add-sub-mul-div 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I think the respective parties are consistently welcoming and hostile to immigrants regardless of who's in power, I don't really know what you mean. Biden would have been hated by the left for doing this. People are so both-sides poisoned they come out with these nonsensical takes reflexively just to virtue signal being "above" having a (public) stance. | |
| ▲ | FirmwareBurner 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [flagged] | | |
| ▲ | eddythompson80 2 days ago | parent [-] | | > If the current admin would cure cancer, HN and the media would find reasons why cancer was not so bad. Uh, the reason is easy. Think of all the poor people who have legitimate reasons to distrust or fear the government. Now those poor victims, understandably, won't trust to get their cancer cured by the current admin. They should have contracted the cure to a non-partisan/non-political institute to not re-victimize those people. Now the rich and powerful will get the cure and the poor will not. /s | | |
| ▲ | jacquesm a day ago | parent [-] | | if there is one thing I'm pretty sure of then it is that under this particular administration cancer will not be cured. Now, about that next pandemic... |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | rich_sasha 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I haven't been following the story closely, but it is clear the Korean workers broke visa rules? Or do they just look a bit foreign and talk funny? Even before Trump there were plenty of stories where ICE clearly didn't know their own country's visa rules. |
| |
| ▲ | rayiner 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | The New York Times write-up on this is pretty good: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/05/us/georgia-battery-plant-.... This plant was under investigation for a significant time. Some citizens and workers with visas were initially detained, but were released once their documentation was verified. The workers being deported were not Hyundai employees, and it seems clear from the company's response that they were not working in the U.S. legally. | | | |
| ▲ | hopelite 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | I can attest that’s companies, especially large ones will generally know the rules better than the various government agencies and people, precisely because they have an incentive to know, they pay people to know, and there is risk involved. They also usually make a determination that the reward is not only greater than the risk, but greater than the consequences, and they have always been proved correct in that calculation. That especially applies to the executives, the people who immensely profit and effectively never face any, let alone effective consequences, so peoples round them also just keep their heads down and look away or even just facilitate the illegal behaviors in order to brown nose and climb the corporate ladder. It is somewhat astonishing, but it seems people are baffled when things don’t change even though consequences for corporations and executives are net positive. Why should they care when the c-suite runs off with way more money than before in the end anyways? Take for example the recent greystar lawsuit by the government for essentially price fixing apartment rents, ie fraud, across the nation. Long story short; estimates are they profited about $2.2 billion every year, the government fined them/agreed to a measly settlement paid to the government; with zero relief or compensation to those they committed their crimes against, nor will the executives that made the illegal decisions suffer any consequences, nor will there be punitive consequences that make executives sit up in attention. | |
| ▲ | jchip303 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | [dead] |
|
|
| ▲ | adolph 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > amazing that theres so much sympathy towards giant Korean megacorp At some level stories are told in a way in which there is a good-guy and a bad-guy and the megacorp drew the good-guy straw this time. It was just a few years ago a Hyundai owned subsidiary was caught in the US employing underage people from Guatemala [0]. 0. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-immi... |
| |
| ▲ | mattnewton 2 days ago | parent [-] | | When that happened, did they give the company a court date or did they raid the factory and detain the children? That’s the difference here. | | |
| ▲ | adolph a day ago | parent | next [-] | | The article insinuates an unannounced visit: After Reuters documented the disappearance of the young girl who worked at SMART, a team of state and federal authorities conducted the Aug. 9 inspection at SL, in Alexander City. They discovered seven minors there, including the two Guatemalan brothers, among employees making lights and mirrors for Hyundai and Kia. Alabama’s Department of Labor fined SL and JK USA Inc, a staffing agency, $17,800 each. | | |
| ▲ | mattnewton a day ago | parent [-] | | So it sounds like they gave them a fine and potentially a court date instead of taking hostages. That's my point. |
| |
| ▲ | bpt3 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Why would you give a court date to the company and allow hundreds of people who are presumably in the country illegally to remain free until said court date? | | |
| ▲ | Tadpole9181 a day ago | parent [-] | | Don't pretend to not know the point. Rich executives and profiteers are the ones committing the actual crime. They're coordinating hundreds of people around with the express intent of using illegal labor to subvert local wages and workers' rights. But every time one of these busts happen, no executives go to jail. They bust in, grab potentially hundreds of instances of those executives committing felonies, and pretend those working class people are the problem, quietly letting the execs giggle away to the bank. Often with a fee single digits percents of what they saved / made. If there were 300 people here working illegally, I want to see multiple Hyundai executive charged with 300 counts of the associated felony crime. | | |
| ▲ | bpt3 a day ago | parent [-] | | > Don't pretend to not know the point. Rich executives and profiteers are the ones committing the actual crime. They're coordinating hundreds of people around with the express intent of using illegal labor to subvert local wages and workers' rights. Then charge them with the appropriate crime. > But every time one of these busts happen, no executives go to jail. They bust in, grab potentially hundreds of instances of those executives committing felonies, and pretend those working class people are the problem, quietly letting the execs giggle away to the bank. Often with a fee single digits percents of what they saved / made. Okay, then fix that instead of deciding to allow a bunch of people who are here illegally to remain because you're upset that other people aren't being charged. > If there were 300 people here working illegally, I want to see multiple Hyundai executive charged with 300 counts of the associated felony crime. Fine by me. Not sure why you're ranting at me about this tangent from the question I asked the parent poster. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | bpt3 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| People don't want to think about details, they just want to continue to hate on the other team and Hyuandi (and their contractors) doing something that would be illegal in just about every country on earth could interfere with that goal. |
|
| ▲ | eddythompson80 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| The enemy of my enemy is my friend is a common underpinning of bad faith arguments. It has been really disheartening seeing a generation of, presumably, leftists abandon decades old demands and movements from local worker protections, global environmental causes, or democratic oversight over ivy league institutes by parroting the same bad arguments their opposition did to them over these decades. As long as I have been alive, very progressive leftists always argued that ivy league institutions need admission reform. They receive billions from our tax dollars, yet their admission policies have always favored the already wealthy and powerful (the rich, alumnus, donors, "elite"). They only pay lip service to "low income families" while straddling most middle class students in insane levels of debt and refuse to publish admission rates. Progressives have always argued that these organizations cannot exist without public (tax payers) funding and as a result should have democratic oversight and should be required to publish their admission rates. We should be withholding that funding or using it as a forcing function for them to do so. The opposition have always argued (in bad faith) to "leave them alone. Education should be independent and they should do whatever they want". Now that a right-wing administration actually put pressure on them (for reasons I disagree with), every "liberal" I know just jumps on the simplest of arguments that "They should be independent. There shouldn't be any oversight required or expected on these educational institutes. That's illegal.". Whats worst is trying to explain how this is a bad argument just gets you yelled at because you must be a "both sides are the same"-person or a secretly republican or "but we're not talking about admission here. We need to unit against the enemy with one argument then we'll figure it out later once education is not under attack" type BS arguments. Same for tariffs and global trade rules and all the global environmental destruction, human rights violations, and local economy mayhem they caused. The argument isn't that these laws need to be tightened and reconsidered to reduce our dependency on slave labor or funding massive environmental polluters or not incentivizing the biggest consumer base on the plant to consider the diesel emissions cost of shipping massive contains full of plastic trinkets across the pacific only for 99% of them to end up in a landfill. Suddenly the argument from progressives and the left are all about the economy. The cost of TEMU for the poor American consumer and how this is the world we live in. There is nothing we can or should do to change it. |
| |
| ▲ | mattnewton 2 days ago | parent [-] | | How we do things matters. The rule of law and due process are important too, a strongman can’t just ignore those, muscle people around to their benefit, and pay lip service to leftist ideals to win over the left. | | |
| ▲ | eddythompson80 a day ago | parent [-] | | Ok.. not really sure what that has to do with what I said. I mentioned nothing about "how we do things". I was only referring to arguments we use for or against things. It's fine to disagree with an action because of "how they are/were done". It's an argument that has thorns of its own, but, again, has nothing to do with what I said. | | |
| ▲ | mattnewton a day ago | parent [-] | | Your argument seemed to boil down to leftists being against things they previously were for, with the implications it's because the right is supporting it. The way I see it that isn't what is happening. Liberals and leftists are alarmed at the rise of authoritarianism and the decay of the law. | | |
| ▲ | eddythompson80 a day ago | parent [-] | | None of what I mentioned has anything to do with the rise of authoritarianism nor the decay of law | | |
| ▲ | mattnewton 18 hours ago | parent [-] | | Exactly, I am offering an alternative explanation for what you are observing than the explanation you provided. |
|
|
|
|
|