This generalizes to a whole new category of tools: UX which requires more thought and skill, but is way more powerful. Human devs are mostly too lazy to use, but LLMs will put in the work to use them.

> UX which requires more thought and skill, but is way more powerful. Human devs are mostly too lazy to use

Really? My thinking is more that human devs are way too likely to sink time into powerful but complex tools that may end up being a yak shave with minimal/no benefit in the end. "too lazy to use" doesn't seem like a common problem from what I've seen.

Not that the speed of an agent being able to experiment with this kind of thing isn't a benefit... but not how I would have thought to pose it.