▲ | discardable_dan 5 days ago | |
My thoughts exactly: he figured out in 2025 what the rest of us knew in 2022. | ||
▲ | positron26 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
One of my work computers died and I hadn't checked the CPU market in years. Rode home that night in a taxi with a Ryzen 1700x completely stoked that AMD was back in the game. If anyone thinks competition isn't good for the market or that also-rans don't have enough of an effect, just take note. Intel is a cautionary tale. I do agree we would have gotten where we are faster with more viable competitors. M4 is neat. I won't be shocked if x86 finally gives up the ghost as Intel decides playing in Risc V or ARM space is their only hope to get back into an up-cycle. AMD has wanted to do heterogeneous stuff for years. Risc V might be the way. One thing I'm finding is that compilers are actually leaving a ton on the table for AMD chips, so I think this is an area where AMD and all of the users, from SMEs on down, can benefit tremendously from cooperatively financing the necessary software to make it happen. | ||
▲ | J_Shelby_J 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
You figured out in 2022 that AMD would finally catch up to intel single core performance in 2025? |