▲ | robocat 3 days ago | |
I disagree. The last sentence kinda strongly implies that there was no redundancy: "the existing brakes does not constitute a redundant system" Or from the Portuguese report:
Google translate:
Of course it could just be saying that the brakes were critical (not redundant?). Summary reports often have spin rather than facts.It turns out that the brakes were critical and they didn't work for whatever reason (design or maintenance or operation or unforseen failure) |