▲ | jaredklewis 4 days ago | |||||||
What's ridiculous about it? Long before AJATT was a site, I think most people would've told you that immersion is a good way to learn a second language. You mention "result to efforts ratio," but I'm not sure I understand what this could me. In language learning, "results" and "efforts" are more or less the same thing. If you read a lot of books, you'll be good at reading books. It's not like there's some reading that is "effort" reading and other reading that is "results" reading; it's all just reading. For most people, the goal of learning Japanese is to be able to use Japanese in the real world. In which case I don’t see why any amount of time spent using Japanese should count as effort (but not results), since that’s the whole point. I never paid any money to AJATT nor agree with everything on the site, but did find it inspirational in various ways early on in my studies. I'm fluent in written and spoken Japanese, and I do think living in Japan as well as immersing myself in Japanese media was a big part of that. I studied French in high school and college using traditional courses and I was never a great French speaker, I think in large part because I didn't do much with French outside the classroom. | ||||||||
▲ | wodenokoto 4 days ago | parent [-] | |||||||
First time I went to ajatt it basically said “with only 18 hours of study a day you too can be fluent in Japanese in two years” | ||||||||
|