Remix.run Logo
doctorhandshake 4 days ago

Independent lab testing of consumer packaged goods is so important, expensive, unprofitable, and downright risky from a libel standpoint that I dare say it should be the role of government to do it.

pljung 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

You essentially describe the motivation for Stiftung Warentest [0]. They’re massively successful in Germany, and I rely on their tests for many consumer goods I buy. Access isn’t free though, typically costs around 5EUR per test. Coincidentally, they recently tested sunscreen [1].

[0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stiftung_Warentest

[1] https://www.test.de/Test-Sonnencreme-und-Sonnenspray-fuer-Er...

doctorhandshake 4 days ago | parent [-]

In the US I like labdoor.com and examine.com and ewg.org but they’re not nearly what I’d like them to be.

EDIT: to clarify, of the three only labdoor does independent testing

KolibriFly 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Feels like one of those classic cases where the market alone can't sort it out, and strong public infrastructure should step in

e40 3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

And yet we are going in the exact opposite direction.

socalgal2 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Yes, because government inspectors are flawless and would never take bribes to let things pass or force them to fail. Nope, they'd never do that.

andreasmetsala 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Certainly a flawed system is better than an outright broken one? At least the former can be improved.

unethical_ban 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

False implication and assuming private companies with solely a profit motive are themselves angels.

...

oh, excuse me. "No siree, never would a for-profit company put out false products, nope, not ever"