This isn't specific to racket, any implementation of R6RS scheme should fully support this, although the define-syntax form is slightly different.

I checked this with my R6RS implementation and it works just as you would expect (https://github.com/maplant/scheme-rs)

valorzard 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

How close are you to getting a "full" implementation of R6RS? I've been thinking of picking either your project or Steel[0] for a Rust Scheme thing

	▲	maplant 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		I’m hoping by the end of the year. All of the “difficult” things are finished (control flow, syntax transformers, call/cc, dynamic wind, exceptions, libraries, etc) and it’s just a matter of filling missing base library functions. If there’s something in particular that you need you’re welcome to file and issue or post a message on the discord and I’ll prioritize it. That being said, Steel is excellent and I highly recommend it if you just need R5RS with syntax transformers

3 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[deleted]

Wow — scheme-rs is such a neat project! Hadn't heard of it before!

Thanks! I haven’t really publicized it, my goal is to get it finished first, but I will be presenting on it at the scheme workshop at ICFP/SPLASH

	▲	skrishnamurthi 2 days ago \| parent [-]
		Neat! Will see if I can make it (though I'll probably have to be dealing with OOPSLA stuff at the same time )-:).