| ▲ | evolve2k 5 days ago | |
Unhelpful, I’d say avoid these brands until they get their house in order; this is a major scandal and the market should be punishing those who clearly did not cover their basic duty of care when selling products that claimed to offer specific SPF sun protection. While true there could be a process issue, it’s very clearly incumbent on manufacturers to correctly prepare and test their product before sending it on to consumers and representing that the product has properties that it may indeed not have. Negligence law covers this well. It’s why you don’t get poisoned too often when you buy food products not prepared in your own home. | ||
| ▲ | summarity 5 days ago | parent [-] | |
Exactly, especially since some brands initially pushed back only to then recall products or fire their labs. Lies all the way to the bottom | ||