> Yeah my wife is also pregnant and sometimes it is really tough on her but she doesn't use any medication other than baby aspirin for blood pressure. The alternative is exercise, anti-inflammatory foods, and also realizing that it isn't just your body anymore and you can't hurt somebody else's chances for a very small amount of pain relief.

It very much is still your wife's body - what other sentient entity is available for consultation?

I also am not sure if she is seeking professional medical advice - 'baby aspirin' is not a blood pressure medication, full stop. If this is based on non-medical doctor advice, please do consult a fully-qualified obstetrician.

Edit, just because this is very worrying to me, for later viewers, aspirin is an NSAID and its use should be weighed similar to that of other NSAIDs in the context of pregnancy. Consider this web page:

https://www.fda.gov/safety/medical-product-safety-informatio...

▲

protonbob 6 days ago | parent | next [-]

This is doctor prescribed. It is an extremely low dose. https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-op...

▲

ejstronge 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

You may not know this, but pre-eclampsia is not a synonym for hypertension. Instead, hypertension is a manifestation of preeclampsia.

The baby aspirin is not for hypertension (it does nothing for hypertension). Its goal is to prevent changes in placental vasculature that may lead to severe pre-eclampsia in those already at risk for pre-eclampsia. One clinical sign that demonstrates risk for pre-eclampsia is high blood pressure.

▲

rubyn00bie 6 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Did that doctor prescribe it to your wife? If not, you’re missing the point of the parent comment and that would be incredibly concerning.

	▲	protonbob 6 days ago \| parent [-]
		Yes a doctor prescribed it to my wife.

▲

foxglacier 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> what other sentient entity is available for consultation?

Surely you don't mean what you imply there? Not being sentient or available for consultation don't justify harming a person. A mother absolutely has a moral responsibility not to cause lifelong harm to the sentient entity her baby will later become. You wouldn't say excess alcohol consumption during pregnancy is only up to the mother's decision about her own body when there are adults walking around with terrible lives because of fetal alcohol syndrome.

▲

kelnos 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

> You wouldn't say excess alcohol consumption during pregnancy is only up to the mother

That's absolutely the case, though, isn't it? I wasn't aware of any laws that bar pregnant women from buying or consuming alcohol. So it's totally up to them.

▲

ejstronge 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

>You wouldn't say excess alcohol consumption during pregnancy is only up to the mother's decision about her own body when there are adults walking around with terrible lives because of fetal alcohol syndrome.

I would - because the alternative means we are locking up current human beings to act as incubators for potential, future humans

	▲	foxglacier 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		Wow, that's a pretty extreme view. They're locking themselves up voluntarily and also locking their baby up. The baby is helpless but not the mother. If she didn't want to and somehow still recklessly got pregnant, she could always get an abortion which may be just a pill from the pharmacy once she missed a period, or more involved if slower. It's a deliberate choice to be responsible for somebody else's life.

▲

Rohansi 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

It's to reduce the risk of preeclampsia.