I disagree - I just had my non-technical sister staying with me, who said she was creeped out by "AI" and didn't like that it heard her in background while her son was talking to Gemini.

An LLM is, at the end of day, a next-word predictor, trying to predict according to training samples. We all understand that it's the depth/sophistication of context pattern matching that makes "stochastic parrot" an inadequate way to describe an LLM, but conceptually it is still more right than wrong, and is the base level of understanding you need, before beginning to understand why it is inadequate.

I think it's better for a non-technical person to understand "AI" as a stochastic parrot than to have zero understanding and think of it as a black box, or sentient computer, especially if that makes them afraid of it.

She's right to be creeped out by the normalization of cloud based processing of her audio and the increasing surveillance infrastructure. No Ai tech understanding needed. Sometimes being more ignorant of details can allow people to see the big picture better.