▲ | ra7 5 days ago | |||||||
$200 to enable better FSD vs a decade of struggle to get FSD only partially working with $20 cameras. Which one do you think is more expensive overall? | ||||||||
▲ | weinzierl 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
The fact that we still do not have a significant number of cars with LIDAR on our streets somewhat proves which approach the auto industry considers viable for business. I am much more curious about the next ten years. If we can bring down the cost of a LIDAR unit into parity with camera systems[1], I think I know the answer. But I thought that 10 years ago and it did not happen so I wonder what is the real roadblock to make LIDAR cheap. [1] Which it won't replace, of course. What it will change is that it makes the LIDAR a regular component, not an exceptionally expensive component. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
▲ | xnx 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
1) make it work 2) make it right 3) make it fast (or cheap in this case) Elon thinks his genius intellect allows him to skip to #3. |