▲ | octo888 4 days ago | |
Take over as in rent for a fee? Nobody mentioned free. Are you against renting homes, hotel rooms etc too? Do you object to the vast spaces that hotels occupy? And if it's public property, well, we all pay taxes and could argue it's collectively owned. Why would it be entitlement? I could say public transport advocates are entitled expecting taxes to pay for vastly expensive public transport infrastructure projects | ||
▲ | jeromegv 4 days ago | parent [-] | |
They are against free or very cheap parking in an urban environment. If you talk of taxes, then yes, you can argue against tax payers subsiding free parking for people living outside that city |