Your first point is correct, but it (like the second one) has no bearing on the issue of the medical soundness of the department's positions and policy.

▲

sandworm101 5 days ago | parent [-]

But the bbc's reputation does support the facts in the article. I am confident that the stock did drop because of what he said, because i trust the BBC not to make up such things.

	▲	mannykannot 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		I feel the same way, but again, this has no bearing on the issue of the medical soundness of the department's positions and policy. Going back to the top of this thread, I agree that correlation does not mean causation, but in this case, we do not yet even have a justifiable claim of correlation, and RFK Jr. has repeatedly demonstrated his propensity for substituting unfounded opinion and incorrect data for empirical facts, if it suits his agenda.