| ▲ | bayindirh 5 days ago | |
> Sure, humans can drive without LIDARs... That's because our stereoscopic vision has infinitely more dynamic range, focusing speed and processing power w.r.t. a computer vision system. Periphery vision is very good at detecting movement, and central view can process tremendous amount of visual data without even trying. Even a state of the art professional action camera system can't rival our eyes in any of these categories. LIDARs and RADARs are useful and shall be present in any car. This is the top reason I'm not considering a Tesla. Brain dead insistence on cameras with small sensors only. | ||
| ▲ | iknowstuff 5 days ago | parent [-] | |
their cams have better dynamic range than your eyes, given they can just run multiexposure and u gotta squint for sunlight. focal point is infinite for driving. You’re not considering them even though they have the best adas on the market lmao suit yourself | ||