> knowledge should be free

As soo as OpenAI open sources their model's source code I'll agree.

mdp2021 7 days ago | parent | next [-]

That is an elision for "public knowledge". Of course there are nuances. In the case of books, there is little doubt: printed for sale is literally named "published".

(The "for sale" side does not limit the purpose to sales only, before somebody wants to attack that.)

▲

LunaSea 7 days ago | parent [-]

Books are private objects sold to buyers. By definition, its not public knowledge.

	▲	mdp2021 6 days ago \| parent [-]
		Again and again: the "book", the item, is a private object, access to the text is freely available - to those member of societies that have decided that knowledge be freely available and have thus established libraries. (They have collected the books - their own - so that we can freely access the texts.)

▲

3836293648 7 days ago | parent | prev [-]

And weights

	▲	rvnx 7 days ago \| parent [-]
		Isn’t it the mission of non-profit “Open”AI and Anthropic “Public Benefit Corporation”, right ?