| ▲ | bkettle 6 days ago |
| > it works for human drivers Sure, for some definition of "works"... https://www.iihs.org/research-areas/fatality-statistics/deta... |
|
| ▲ | Rohansi 5 days ago | parent [-] |
| Vision is almost certainly not the main issue with humans as drivers. |
| |
| ▲ | NaomiLehman 5 days ago | parent [-] | | it's one of the reasons. | | |
| ▲ | Rohansi 5 days ago | parent [-] | | For sure, but my phone camera sees better than I do. Cars can make use of better camera sensors and have more than two of them. You can't just extrapolate the conclusion that human vision bad = vision sensors bad. | | |
| ▲ | NaomiLehman 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | we can't conclude that LIDAR is better than a camera? Is it worth cutting the costs? LIDAR has everything that a camera has plus more. | |
| ▲ | shpx 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Cameras are nowhere near the fidelity and responsiveness of human eyes. |
|
|
|
