▲ | Karrot_Kream 5 days ago | |||||||||||||
> pushes content triggering strong emotional reactions should be banned Aren't you describing your own comment? Aren't upvotes pushing that to the top? So isn't HN the thing that needs to be banned according to your comment? | ||||||||||||||
▲ | blargey 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
The opposite, actually - I remember reading that HN downranks posts that have a low favorability:engagement ratio - in its case, high comment count and comparatively low votes. The reasoning being that flamebait topics inspire a disproportionate number of angry/low-substance/pile-on comments and retort-chains compared to normal topics, without garnering a corresponding increase in top-level votes. It's imperfect, but afaik most social media does the opposite (all "engagement" is good engagement), and I imagine, say, Twitter would be much nicer if it tuned its algo to not propagate posts with an unusually high view/retweet count relative to likes. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | abdullahkhalids 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
No. Facebook algorithm produces different outputs for every user. HN's algorithm produces one output for all users. They are qualitatively distinct. Facebooks' algorithm is demonstrably harmful. HN's not so much. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | jerrycruncher 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
This is a really canonical example of a "Yet you participate in a society. Curious!" post. Well done. [0] https://imgur.com/we-should-improve-society-somewhat-T6abwxn | ||||||||||||||
|