▲ | tim333 5 days ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
>If you ask it about anything political it's going to be from a certain slant I'm not sure if there's anything else out there that's better at giving a fairly neutral summary of political controversies? It reminds me of the Churchill quote "democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.…" | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | voldacar 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
A quantitative look which might interest you: https://davidrozado.substack.com/p/is-wikipedia-politically-... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | Gareth321 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ground.news is quite good. It provides a bias meter next to publications, and offers a blind spot tool so one doesn't only see one side of a report or discussion. Wikipedia doesn't have such a counter-measure. Most of the political pages have been entirely captured and there are no mechanisms promote neutrality. On the contrary. WikiProjects, Arbitration Committees, and Administrators are all very entrenched positions and once the scales tipped towards a left wing American political bias, there is no way to tip them back. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|