| ▲ | ckbkr10 5 days ago |
| I wish there was a honest discussion, I am with them about parents not giving a shit and pushing away responsibility. The idea of supervision in education institutions is good as well. The kids in my family were well protected and supervised, they got into contact with hardcore porn at the age of 6 when other kids had access to smartphones and exposed them to it. I would like to see a honest discussion about the impact of porn on kids, I cannot really imagine that it doesn't distort the view and expectations on sex. In my 20s I was promiscious and lived what I saw in pornography, only later in life I learned about normal sex. In germany we had a state sponsored porn flick once produced by ZDF Neo, maybe that is the approach to expose the kids to material that shows sex as a respectable flow rather than an extreme fantasy. |
|
| ▲ | jakobnissen 5 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| But kids (and adults) are exposed to all kinds of fantasies. War is not like Call of Duty. The Mafia is not like GTA. Monarchy is not like in the fairy tales. Romance is not like Twilight. BDSM is not like 50 Shades of Grey. For all these things, we rely on people's world experience and common sense to figure it out. I think it's pretty obvious that sex is not like porn, and I don't understand why so many people are convinced that people can't tell the difference between fantasy and reality in this domain specifically. |
| |
| ▲ | jjcob 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | People can't tell the difference in any domain. People copy what they see. It's why James Bond stopped smoking in movies, and people smoke far less now. Mainstream porn sites show a lot of weird practices (what's up with that strangulation fetish??) and I do think it has a bad influence. I don't think age verification is a good solution, because we don't become immune to influence at age 18. Adults are just as vulnerable to copying poor behavior as minors. I think we should do the opposite: Remove stigma associated with sexuality. Why can't more movies just include everyday sex scenes? Why do we need to make this distinction where you need to go to a different site if you want to see something more explicit than a nipple? Most people probably wouldn't even go to porn sites if they could just watch something steamy on Netflix. | | |
| ▲ | jolmg 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | > Adults are just as vulnerable to copying poor behavior as minors. Adults can be vulnerable, but I don't think just as vulnerable. Youngsters with no initial idea of how a given thing works have nothing with which to compare and contrast and potentially reject the first idea presented to them. Generally, the younger, the more impressionable. > Remove stigma associated with sexuality. [...] Most people probably wouldn't even go to porn sites if they could just watch something steamy on Netflix. I do agree with loosening the stigma. If there are parents that are giving their children unrestricted access to the internet, and those children may expose things to others that have better parental controls, then the straightforward solution is to have some form of earlier sex-ed. Doesn't need to cover everything, but enough to prepare them against the bad influences they'll apparently encounter. "Something steamy on Netflix" may be a positive counterexample to help them reject nonsense fantasies on porn sites. | |
| ▲ | high_na_euv 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | >. It's why James Bond stopped smoking in movies, and people smoke far less now. Lol what, what makes you think it was caused by James Bond, not countless other anti smoking initiatives? | | |
| ▲ | chii 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | It's a feedback loop - smoking was advertised as being cool way back when, which led to movie characters smoking to appear cool, which then reinforces the advertising. When there was a push to regulate smoking in advertising, it cut the original feedback loop which made film/tv characters not use smoking as a sign of being cool. This led to advertising (if it were allowed) to be less effective at portrayal of coolness via smoking. It's not a simple one-to-one cause and effect. | | |
| ▲ | Retric 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Vaping took off as a cool thing without a bunch of cool people vaping in movies. People stopped smoking in movies at the same time a lot of other smoking related things changed. Similarly smokers likely notice people smoking in movies more than non smokers. | | |
| ▲ | jennyholzer 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I remember a viral twitter photo of Sophie Turner smoking a Juul while filming the last episodes of Game of Thrones Juul changed the cultural standing of vaping and (for a very brief moment of time) made it "cool" by means of social media celebrity promotion. They were hit with pretty aggressive punishment for this by the US FDA if I'm not mistaken. | | |
|
| |
| ▲ | bgarbiak 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It was cool to smoke when all the cool guys in the movies were smoking. One of the reasons it’s not cool anymore is that the cool guys in the movies don’t smoke nowadays (although they do it more often now than they did ten years ago; which is worrying). The correlation between an exposure and initiating smoking is proved: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27043456/ | | |
| ▲ | Retric 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Correlation is not causation, vaping didn’t need movies. | | |
| ▲ | jennyholzer 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Vaping needed social media | | |
| ▲ | Retric 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Fads long predate social media. Instead social media and vaping came into their own on similar timelines but adoption of vaping just never saw the kind of hockey stick curve you see from a major fad. Instead it was relatively slow taking ~10 years to hit 25 million users and ~20 years to hit 85 million users keeping it niche vs the ~1,100 million smokers. |
|
|
| |
| ▲ | close04 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It’s not that people stopped but that they didn’t start. Smoking was no longer sold as cool so kids didn’t learn of it as a cool thing. Kids and even adults pick up cues from games, movies, books. War is like CoD and heroic war movies (why do many 18 year olds go to the army expecting glory and come back with trauma and broken dreams?), sex is like in porn, and gangs are like in GTA. Until they gain practical experience and slowly realize some things are vastly different. Maybe a couple will love “porn sex”. Most others will break a leg having shower sex and reconsider the “teachings”. | |
| ▲ | WesolyKubeczek 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Characters in movies stopped (or reduced a lot) smoking pretty much across the board. |
|
| |
| ▲ | Al-Khwarizmi 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | It's different. One big part of the reason has already been said in sibling comments: taboo. Kids know that the huge jumps in martial arts movies are impossible because they jump when they play, they have seen their friends and classmates jump, they probably have tried flying kicks when playing so they get an idea of where the limits are. Nothing of this happens with sex, plus often they aren't exposed to anyone talking about it, except of course in porn. The other part is the huge insecurities people have in this domain. You will meet a lot of people who aren't afraid to tell you that they dance like crap, or have no musical ear, or are in bad shape, etc.; but even if you meet people who talk about sex, no one is going to tell you that they last one minute in bed. | | |
| ▲ | Cthulhu_ 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Taboo exactly; I will freely talk with colleagues and friends about e.g. GTA or action movies; watching movies and playing games is a communal and public thing. But nobody talks about what they do in the bedroom; nobody goes to a movie theater to watch porn, people are awkward when there's sex scenes in films (and mainstream films have stopped having them altogether it seems), teenagers run away if their parents ever broach the subject, etcetera. |
| |
| ▲ | maccard 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | We shouldn’t be giving 6 year olds access to call of duty or GTA either. PEGI ratings (although overzealous) are a god starting point. I wouldn’t withhold an average 10 year old from a 12 rated game, but I wouldn’t give them access to an 18+. Also, we (usually) talk about these things - video games are not the only source of discourse of violence or conflict, but sex is such a taboo topic that it’s highly likely most or all of someone’s knowledge will come from what they’ve learned on the internet | | |
| ▲ | DrillShopper 4 days ago | parent [-] | | > PEGI ratings (although overzealous) are a god starting point. PEGI says FIFA Ultimate Team: Parental Wallet Draining is PEGI 3. Maybe PEGI should clean its house before we defer to it. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Aeolun 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > I would like to see a honest discussion about the impact of porn on kids, I cannot really imagine that it doesn't distort the view and expectations on sex. Only if they have no other exposure to this pretty damn normal thing. If all the adults in their life refuse to talk about because of some misplaced idea it is shameful, where are they going to get that info? Not saying that’s the case for you, just that it’s the impression I get from many people. |
|
| ▲ | _mu 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What is really missing is good sex education in schools, especially public schools - and in particular in the United States. The state of sex education in America actually deserves the work deplorable, it's so bad. Looking at this comment thread, I get the sense that people are coming from vastly different backgrounds and upbringings. There's no baseline established for what people are trying to discuss. There are a lot of topics that should simply be explained to children up front from a very early age. When a topic is not shrouded in mystery, it becomes boring. So kids should learn from an early age what is sex, puberty, menstruation, homosexuality, etc. and it should be presented in a manner-of-fact way that takes the emotional charge out of the picture. When people are educated, they have more latitude to make good decisions. |
|
| ▲ | Retric 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > I would like to see a honest discussion about the impact of porn on kids, I cannot really imagine that it doesn't distort the view and expectations on sex. There’s a bunch of studies on this and at the individual level it seems to do a bunch of stuff, but at the population level it has at most an effect so small it can’t be measured. Which IMO suggests causation goes in the other direction. IE if you’re entering puberty early you may seek both porn and sex at a younger age. That said, I’m not an expert and have only briefly looked through the literature. |
|
| ▲ | Hizonner 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > In my 20s I was promiscious and lived what I saw in pornography, only later in life I learned about normal sex. News flash. That is normal in your 20s and always has been. |
| |
| ▲ | antonymoose 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Only for the last few decades, this has almost always been a taboo across all of humanity, this high level promiscuity you speak of. Hardly a normative experience across space and time. | | |
| ▲ | const_cast 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | It only really became taboo due to religion and the associated oppression of women. Humans, for the vast majority of the time they existed, were largely free range. Lots and lots of sex. I assure you, hunter gatherers were not monogamous suburbanites who attended their white Christian church. | |
| ▲ | Hizonner 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Well, OK, that's true. I was wrong with "always". It's only been the norm since we've had effective birth control, decent pregnancy and early-life health care, cures for most serious STDs, the notion that neither women nor children are property, what would nowadays seem like a reasonable amount of individual physical and social mobility and independence, certain knowledge of paternity, a less inheritance-based economic system where certainty of paternity isn't as overwhelmingly important anyway, and whatever else I'm forgetting. But those are the new normal. Or at least one may hope they'll stay normal. And they've definitely been more or less normal throughout the lifetimes of anybody who's in this forum. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | happymellon 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Why don't they do things that are within their control. Such as mandatory site filtering options. So the same place you pay your bill, you can also set which sites you want to be blocked by an "admin" password. Or are they afraid that people will add tracking.facebook.com to the block list? The chances of the kids stealing the admin password are about as likely as the kids stealing your age verification password that you needed to set up to access Reddit. |
| |
| ▲ | blitzar 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Parents dont want to be the "bad guy" or parents in any real sense. | | |
| ▲ | edu 5 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I think it's more the case that many parents are not tech savvy enough to even know that's possible or how to do it. Also, this create a safety net which seems too fragile, as you just need one family that doesn't do it to potentially expose all their friends. | | |
| ▲ | blitzar 4 days ago | parent | next [-] | | It's no different to the phones for toddlers at school - they can, they know how, they are just even more affected by FOMO, peer pressure and judgement than children. The other excuses are all just cope - little Timmy will just find a way around the blocks is true. Little Timmy can also get Heroin if he really wants or just one family might offer all the kids a hit on a crack pipe but it isn't an excuse to keep a needle, pipe and some fresh gear in the living room. | |
| ▲ | happymellon 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | The rules can be whatever they want them to be. Block adult sites by default (much like a lot of phone companies already do) and the account owner can go in a make changes. You only need one kid with a fake id that works, or for them to discover AI that can fake faces on a webcam to potentially expose all their friends... Lazyness is a terrible excuse |
| |
| ▲ | gorgoiler 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | And as another commenter points out, this also requires parents to unionize and enforce blocks together. (”Block en bloc” if you will.) Otherwise Timmy just uses Johnny’s phone to watch XXX videos. I’m not arguing for either side, just pointing out a reality of the situation. | | |
| ▲ | hedora 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Who are these six year olds with cell phone plans? They’re going to use their parents’ devices, which are all age verified anyway. More to the point: Age block technologies have been around since the mid 90’s and, for thirty years, parents have voted with their wallets and not installed them. In areas where they’re free, parents still don’t want them. |
|
| |
| ▲ | stevenicr 4 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | I too have wondered why there has not been huge pressure from parents to demand that cell phone hardware and the cell companies (and cable companies) - offer a portal they can log into and choose a 'bouncer / blocking system' I have suggested publicly in the past that there should be a set of community blocker bots that are transparent about what they do and do not block and they are easy to fork and change for this sort of thing. And parents can choose which level of blocking their networks adhere to. Of course they could just block all things sex for the moment - But parents have not demanded this. I imagine that way back in the day when if the porn via cable boxes was enabled by default, many parents would not have chosen to just give their kids one in the living room and one in their bedroom, many houses put one in every room of the house. And yet they know that these phone devices can bring up porn and many worse things - and they just hand them over with an unlimited data plan like its nothing. Many years ago, some parents could argue they did not know there was naughty things on the telephone like connected to the computers, but today's parents grew up with the porn on the internet and most partents just give them unlimited anytime access to all the things. If the zealots riling up the churches and mom groups and such truly believe that porn is proven scientifically destruction to the children, why are the parents not in trouble for giving these devices to the kids? Like giving a car and alcohol and unlimited ammo to what 90% of kids? I do believe part of the problem has been non-great options for blocking. (I have heard there are more options today than there were when I researched this a bit 10 years ago - back then disney circle (too expensive) and an open source dns poisoning thing I couldn't figure out how to setup) But I think we also need to be honest that all parents know the porn is there (and worse, they know they have cameras on these devices and things like snap have been around so long everyone knows there are worse things that can be done with these devices) - and yet people have not demanded non-camera, all adult blocked devices, in fact they have been buying them up and paying premium prices to provide unlimited 24/7 access. So the few people who are getting their ego stroked by the choir for saving the children, it would seem being in their bubbling is preventing them from seeing the reality of the people's choices, and providing better alternatives and education. It seems every year each group needs a boogie man to raise money and get the likes and shares before campaign season. It's a shame they are willing to slay the rights of people just to get some temporary popularity - and likely knowing it's not going to fix the thing, but it is going to cost time and money for many - but they don't care about the masses. |
|
|
| ▲ | anal_reactor 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > I would like to see a honest discussion about the impact of porn on kids, I cannot really imagine that it doesn't distort the view and expectations on sex. Honestly I'm really surprised that the generation that grew up on free access to internet porn and turned out fine is suddenly acting so prudish. As a kid I really believed that when my generation grows up, we'll be "the cool parents". Of course porn distorted my view of sex, but let's be real - this damage is absolutely nothing compared to American family movies where a family of four with one adopted token black kid has a minor issue and then resolves it and everyone lives happily everafter. Those sold me the fantasy that as an adult I'd have lots of friends and a loving family and a satisfying job, and when none of that happened, I spent years feeling deep disappointment, which I still haven't processed. Meanwhile hardcore porn I watched... look, that's the absolute least of issues I had as a kid. Growing up gay in a conservative country never gave me a chance to learn about proper relationships, I was immediately pushed into the underground world of hookups with shady people. Not to mention the plethora of other, unrelated issues, like constant bullying at school which nobody gave a fuck about, abusive parents, or ghetto community promoting criminal lifestyle. Or thinking even larger: what about whole generation that enters job market into recession, what about whole generation that will never build capital because they're trapped in a cycle of poverty, what about the constant fear that WW3 might be happening, what about social connections dissolving and people becoming more and more aggressive towards each other. But those are difficult problems to tackle, so let's focus on kids seeing a naked titty instead. For sure that's a great use of our limited time. |
| |
| ▲ | edu 5 days ago | parent [-] | | But I think a big difference is that while the current parent generation grow up with free access to internet, our access was limited usually to the family computer. For us internet access was a bit of a ritual—find a computer and got some privacy. Or you could risk getting caught at the computer lab. Now, the internet is ubiquitous and many kids have access to connected devices all the time (computers, tablets, smartphones) and it's harder to overview their use. Also, the amount of content and extreme content available has exploded. | | |
| ▲ | anal_reactor 5 days ago | parent [-] | | But I think a big difference is that while the current parent generation grow up with family computers, our access was limited usually to porn magazines.
For us magazines were a bit of a ritual—find one and got some privacy. Or you could risk getting caught at the library. Now, the internet is ubiquitous and many kids have access to connected devices at their homes (computers, landline phones) and it's harder to overview their use. Also, the amount of content and extreme content available has exploded. --- I leave as an exercise for the reader to one-up this argument regarding the introduction of porn magazines themselves, porn drawings once paper became a commodity, as so on, dating all the way back to the first human sculpture (fat woman with giant boobs). | | |
| ▲ | edu 4 days ago | parent [-] | | I totally agree on the easiness of accessing content |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | michaelt 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > I would like to see a honest discussion about the impact of porn on kids, I cannot really imagine that it doesn't distort the view and expectations on sex. It's extremely difficult to get solid evidence of this stuff, as it all happens so slowly it's inseparable from many other gradual forces in society. Are people getting married and having children less, because porn has undermined their ability to form healthy adult relationships? Or is it because of a successful campaign against teen pregnancy? A rise in women's education levels making them want to wait to start a family? Contraception and pre-marital sex removing a major incentive to settle down? Society's infantilisation of men, who should put away childish things at a much younger age? A housing crisis and hollowing out of the lower middle class meaning people can't hope to afford a family home until middle age? A preference the man out-earns the woman being incompatible with a world where women out-perform men in education? Fears about the future, like the climate crisis? A decline in religion and traditional family values? The rise of online/app-based dating? Our main tools for disentangling these influences are, as far as I can tell, vibes and anecdotes. |
|
| ▲ | lukan 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Hm .. there is porn and there is porn. Of course the professional casts are fake, but there is usually for example a amateur porn category, a bit closer to reality. So if you blame porn for you being promiscious ... I would say you had the choice what kind of porn you watch. And likely rather, what kind of friends you hang around with. |
|
| ▲ | edu 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| But from your own case, how do you protect your kids from other kids accessing hardcore porn at the age of 6? That would be a great argument in favour of blocking access unless age verification is provided so you reduce the chance of the "weakest link", otherwise as much as I can content block any device used by my kids the surface of having some other kid whose parent don't care/know how to block it would be enormous. |