Yeah, I meant to be clear that 4× was the worst case, and I think it's an impressive achievement already, and perfectly fine for almost everything. After all, running single-threaded software on an 8-core CPU is already an 8× slowdown, right? And people do that all the time!

What's the minimal code size overhead for FUGC?

▲

pizlonator 5 days ago | parent [-]

> What's the minimal code size overhead for FUGC?

I don’t have good data on this.

The FUGC requires the compiler to emit extra metadata and that metadata is hilariously inefficient right now. I haven’t bothered to optimize it. And the FUGC implementation pulls in all of libpas even though it almost certainly doesn’t have to.

So I don’t know what minimal looks like right now

	▲	gr4vityWall 5 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It's refreshing to see a honest, no-nonsense, not full of marketing-speak reply for once. Your replies on this thread have been great. :)
	▲	kragen 5 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		I see, thanks!