Phew seldom have I heard such a wrong thing. Bitcoin makes absolutely no sense as an actual transacting day to day third world currency because A) it is completely incapable of scaling to the task due to the projects allergy to sensible development hobbling it to 20 year old technology B) because of A, the transaction fees are many times the weekly salary or even yearly salary of those target users.

Bitcoin was an interesting idea. 20 years ago. It's entirely without merit now, but it will take decades to fade into obscurity, pumping out carbon the whole time.

▲

Zpalmtree 4 days ago | parent [-]

Current bitcoin fees are 17 cents. Not anywhere near weekly salary.

Regardless, they don't need to use bitcoin for their day to day transactions. Just somewhere to put their savings that won't be inflated away. USDC would make much more sense of course.

	▲	FireBeyond 3 days ago \| parent [-]
		Half of the world's population lives on less than US$2.15 a day. You're right, nowhere near weekly salary. Just three transactions a day will only use up 25% of their earnings. > Just somewhere to put their savings that won't be inflated away. What fucking savings? And uhh, what are they doing, then, just making periodic conversions to fiat that is, as you point out, "inflated away"? You're trying to have it both ways, "crypto is immune to inflation problems, that's why it's important to a lot of the world", and then when someone points out transaction fees, "Oh, you wouldn't really use crypto daily, you'd still use that fiat with inflation problems, you'd just keep your "savings" in crypto". It is laughable how much fervor goes into these kind of statements that have had little to no critical thinking applied.