▲ | lurking_swe 5 days ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
i’ll leave you with this to ponder. It would be pretty weird if george washington, Thomas Jefferson, etc were here with us today. We’d probably still be debating if slavery is acceptable or not LOL. People complain about boomers hoarding all the wealth and “never letting go” so younger folks can take the reins. Imagine how much worse it would be if those boomers lived until 200? Imagine how much more fossil fuel we’d be burning if we all lived until 200? You know how old people tend to get stubborn? Not all, but most? Now imagine if the U.S. government was comprised of mostly people age 100+. Imagine how they would do keeping up with changes that affect youngsters in 2025? Imagine how bad the housing crisis would be in 2025. Imagine how unmotivated people would be in day to day life if they knew they’d live to 200 years? In summary…if everyone could easily live forever, that is not a good thing. It would drastically change society as we know it, and not 100% for the better. I’d argue it would actually make things worse. Death is literally a biological process that affects all living organisms on this planet, and in the galaxy. Sorry if that’s hard to accept? I personally find it beautiful how “energy” is recycled once we die, through the soil, and eventually into other things - like a tree, etc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
▲ | ACCount37 5 days ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I find it hard to imagine that an 80 years old politician today spends a lot of time thinking of what would happen 50 or 100 years down the line. And things like fossil fuel use are very much a "50 to 100 years down the line" kind of problem. Now, if that very politician thought that with the way anti-aging technology is going, he'll probably live to 150, maybe 200 if he's lucky? That might change the equation - for the better. I don't think that "kill everyone to avoid the risk of the political system getting marginally worse" is an optimal solution. I'd rather deal with aging and the shittiness of politics as two separate problems with a minor overlap. >I personally find it beautiful how “energy” is recycled once we die, through the soil, and eventually into other things - like a tree, etc. I think that this is nothing but socially accepted cope. A load of pseudo-profound bullshit that might be easier to accept than the idea that aging and death are really fucking bad and we aren't doing much to stop them. And that even if we did, we and our loved ones may not be the ones to ever benefit from it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|