| ▲ | nashashmi 5 days ago |
| Tracking people walking through malls. Or even better: tracking everyone in the sidewalk of a NYC street after they commit a crime and where they end up at. |
|
| ▲ | palata 5 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Don't we have phones for that? |
| |
| ▲ | anonporridge 5 days ago | parent [-] | | That only catches the stupid criminals, which to be fair is most of them. | | |
| ▲ | palata 4 days ago | parent [-] | | Not sure how many criminals that catches, but phones most certainly track everybody. | | |
|
|
|
| ▲ | pempem 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Ah yes, tracking everyone. The one system that only leads to good outcomes. |
| |
| ▲ | lemonberry 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Well, we know that tracking "everyone" would only lead to tracking a subset of everyone. A subset with a lot less money and power than those in charge of the tracking. Much like the guard or observer in the panopticon. | | |
| ▲ | nashashmi 4 days ago | parent [-] | | It might cause people to carry WiFi jammers. | | |
| ▲ | transpute 4 days ago | parent [-] | | > WiFi jammers Any active RF broadcasting device would function as a "look at me" homing beacon. |
|
|
|
