▲ | j2kun 6 days ago | |||||||||||||
In this case, Stripe is adding themselves as a middleman. Whether or not it was the point of Bitcoin from the start, "removing the middlemen" is bullshit because you still need exchanges, wallet providers, people running nodes, etc. Cryptocurrency in practice just transfers power from traditional middlemen to new technically-advantaged middlemen. | ||||||||||||||
▲ | bravoetch 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||
The middleman that bitcoin is cleaved from is banks (that have control over all balances and transactions), and payment processors (same controls). Previously these were required unless you handed physical cash to someone. Now electronic transactions are free of those controls and the associated risk. Exchanges are not bitcoin, you can transact freely without them. Wallet providers are not bitcoin, they are 100% optional. Nodes don't act as middlemen, they are fabric. | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
▲ | insane_dreamer 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||||||||
> you still need exchanges, wallet providers, people running nodes, etc you don't need exchanges or wallet providers, or any other intermediary, to exchange Bitcoin -- those add layers of convenience (conversion, storage), but they do _not_ strengthen the web of trust and do not provide the same function as intermediary banks and clearing houses do yes, you do need people running nodes, but they're not intermediate layers, and you can run a node yourself to benefit from the system (though in practice it's no longer profitable due to bitcoin farms) | ||||||||||||||
▲ | dmak 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||
If the banking system was compromised from war, Bitcoin still functions without them | ||||||||||||||
|