Did you look into why? They always list the reasons. How long had it been on the page?

It had been at least 2 years. [] Never became much of a contentious issue until Kamala was looking at the presidential nomination, from what I can tell, then suddenly there was a vicious fight to remove it based on reasoning that mysteriously didn't exist for years and years before that.

[] https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donald_J._Harris&...

Edit: at least ~4 years

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Donald_J._Harris&...

▲

IAmBroom 5 days ago | parent [-]

Or, it wasn't important enough to merit editorial discussion prior to that.

	▲	mothballed 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		Flipping >Any controversial topic should never be read on Wikipedia, it will not be accurate. to >A controversial topic will become important enough to merit editorial discussion Is an interesting point. I think I will vouch you just for the genius of flipping it.